Donald Trump has issued a warning that “changes are coming” — not in foreign policy or the economy, but for the media itself.

Angered by negative coverage of a failed strike on Iran, Trump accused the press of being “out of control” and hinted that retaliation could be in the works.

His remarks quickly drew backlash from press freedom advocates, who viewed them as more than political bluster. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) condemned the comments as a direct threat to the First Amendment.

Critics argue that when a president openly threatens journalists, the line between rhetoric and action begins to blur. What begins as verbal hostility can evolve into efforts to silence scrutiny.

For more than two centuries, a free press has served as one of democracy’s strongest safeguards. Trump’s words raise doubts about whether political leaders are willing to tolerate accountability — or if they will try to weaken it.

Journalists now face a dual challenge: reporting on those in power while also defending the very conditions that allow them to do so. The question has shifted from how to cover the news to how to protect the freedom to publish it.

History offers caution. Societies that allow rulers to intimidate truth-tellers often drift into authoritarianism. As Sufi wisdom reminds us, “Silence before oppression is itself a form of speech.”

The press, then, must endure. Its role is not only to inform the public but to continue speaking when power turns against it. The danger is real, but so too is the responsibility to resist it.